Radiation Lab Field Pro

Example: a Cs-137 field at 2.5 m — air kerma rate, lead HVL and Hp(10)

Field Pro · updated 28 October 2026

A caesium-137 irradiator is the workhorse of a radiation-protection calibration room: one line at 661.657 keV, a half-life long enough to plan around and short enough to matter. This example takes a source certified ten years ago, brings its activity to today, and gives the air kerma rate, the dose-equivalent rates and the lead half-value layer at a 2.5 m test point.

Inputs

Open the workbench with Cs-137 selected and enter the values below. The activity and dates are illustrative; use your own certificate.

PanelFieldValue
01 SourceSourceCs-137
01 SourceActivity10 GBq
01 SourceReference date (certificate)2016-01-01
01 SourceEvaluation date2026-10-28
01 SourceDistance2.5 m
02 Geometryα / HVL material0° / Auto (lead)

Results

QuantityValue
Elapsed time3953 d (10.82 a)
Activity on the evaluation date7.793 GBq (decay factor 0.7793)
Air kerma rate at 2.5 m94.53 µGy/h
Hp(10, 0°)/Ka, slab1.216 Sv/Gy → 115.0 µSv/h
H*(10)/Ka1.203 Sv/Gy → 113.7 µSv/h
H′(0.07, 0°)/Ka1.200 Sv/Gy → 113.4 µSv/h
HVL1 in lead (narrow beam)5.600 mm Pb
Homogeneity coefficient1 (single line)
Radionuclide check against S-Cs661.657 keV vs 661.6 keV nominal

Panel C does not search the X-ray table for a nuclide; it compares the field with the S-Cs quality of ISO 4037 instead.

What the numbers say

Dates are part of the calibration. Over 10.82 years the source has lost 22% of its activity, and it keeps losing 2.3% a year. A rate table written at commissioning and never re-dated is 2.3% wrong after one year and 11% wrong after five. Entering the evaluation date each time costs nothing.

The rate scales with the inverse square of distance, and only that. At 1 m the same source gives 590.8 µGy/h, 6.25 times the 2.5 m value. The point-source formula ignores the air in between; with the engine's own attenuation data, 2.5 m of air would remove 2.3% of the primary kerma, while scatter from the air, the collimator and the room adds some back. Those effects are why a laboratory fixes its rates by measurement with a calibrated chamber and uses a calculation like this one to plan and to check.

The calculated rate constant sits slightly low. Dividing the rate by activity and multiplying by d² gives 0.0758 µGy·m²·MBq⁻¹·h⁻¹, 1.7% below the literature value of 0.0771 used in the test suite. The engine models only the gamma line; the barium K X-rays near 32 keV are absent, and with them a small low-energy share of the kerma.

Lead attenuators. In the narrow-beam model each 5.6 mm of lead halves the air kerma rate, and 22.4 mm (four half-value layers) leaves 6.25%, about 5.9 µGy/h at 2.5 m. Real attenuators in a collimated beam add forward scatter, so the measured reduction is smaller; the narrow-beam value is the right one for describing beam quality and the wrong one for shielding a room.

Choose the quantity before the coefficient. At this energy Hp(10) on the slab exceeds H*(10) by only 1.1%, so mixing them up hides easily; it is still a different quantity with a different phantom, and a personal dosemeter must be compared with Hp(10).

The X-ray counterpart of this example is the N-80 field; how the decay and kerma formulas are built is on the Methods page.

Sources

  1. IAEA Nuclear Data Section, Live Chart of Nuclides: Cs-137 half-life 30.08 a, 661.657 keV line at 85.1% per decay, Ba K X-rays.
  2. ISO 4037-3:2019, recommended conversion coefficients for S-Cs: Hp(10) 1.21, H*(10) 1.20, H′(0.07) 1.21 Sv/Gy.
  3. J. H. Hubbell, S. M. Seltzer, X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients, NIST Standard Reference Database 126 (lead and air).
  4. Literature rate constant as used in the engine's decay tests.

Open the workbench →